Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Todd et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02242
Plaintiff:
Mattie Todd and Ronnie Todd
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Gynecare Worldwide, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Scissom et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02239
Plaintiff:
Tammy Scissom and Kenneth Scissom
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cregan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02203
Plaintiff:
Adelle Cregan and Harold Cregan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Ward et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02198
Plaintiff:
Mary Ward and Jeffrey S. Ward
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
VanStone v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02214
Plaintiff:
Blaine VanStone
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Endo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Danko et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02207
Plaintiff:
Joann Danko and John M. Danko
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02212
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Endo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Johnson et al v. Boston Scientific, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02217
Plaintiff:
Linda Darleene Bell Johnson and Raymond F. Johnson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Goodner v. Boston Scientific, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02216
Plaintiff:
Tammy Goodner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Brieske et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-02206
Plaintiff:
Dolores Brieske and Derek Brieske
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
