Cases 1 - 10 of 356
Ortega v. Insurance Company of Texas
as 5:2024cv01038
Defendant:
American-Amicable Life Insurance Company of Texas
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Marquis et al v. Sadeghian et al
as 3:2024cv02265
Defendant:
Amy Sadeghian and Khosrow Sadeghian
Plaintiff:
Paul Stansbery, Alexis Marquis, Juanita Marquis and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ortega v. Ambrosio et al
as 5:2024cv00838
Defendant:
Louis Ambrosio and Block Equity Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. Elite Living Realty, LLC
as 5:2024cv00768
Defendant:
Elite Living Realty, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. DH & RK Investments LLC
as 5:2024cv00769
Defendant:
DH & RK Investments LLC doing business as FundQube
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
