Cases 151 - 160 of 1,984
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00407
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
BROWDY v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
SHAWN W BROWDY
Defendant:
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY, DAVID CARON and MITCHELL TANNENBAUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANTHONY v. HOULTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
JAMES A ANTHONY
Defendant:
HOULTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, TRAVIS SMITH and OFFICER 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANTHONY v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
JAMES A ANTHONY
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANTHONY v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
JAMES A ANTHONY
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NICHOLAS v. CAMUSO
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
JB NICHOLAS
Defendant:
JUDY A CAMUSO
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIKE et al v. BUDD
as 1:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA PIKE and NATASHA IRVING
Defendant:
CHARLES F BUDD, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SCHUSTER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHUSTER
Defendant:
DANNY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WICKHAM v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J WICKHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.