Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Raidoo et al v. Camacho, et al.
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Arthur San Agustin, Antonio Rapadas, Nathaniel Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Bliss Kaneshiro and Shandhini Raidoo
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Washington D.C. Seattle Manufacturing Inc. et al v. Department of Public Health and Social Services et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Washington D.C. Seattle Manufacturing Inc., Jaydeen C. Dela Cruz and Jaydeen Catherine Dela Cruz
Defendant:
Guam Housing and Urban Renewal Authority (GHURA), Department of Public Health and Social Services, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Arias v. San Agustin et al
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Francisco C. Arias
Defendant:
Jose A. San Agustin, Alan Borja, Samuel Donato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Guam et al
as 1:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Arnold Davis
Defendant:
Guam , Guam Election Commission, Alice M. Taijeron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryan v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan
Defendant:
F.B.I., S.L.E.D., U.S. Attorney (S.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. F.B.I. et al
as 1:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan
Defendant:
F.B.I., S.L.E.D., U.S. Attorney (S.C.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
