Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Jenkins v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Daniel Loren Jenkins
Defendant:
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Colette Peters, Rob Persson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeSantiago v. Scales
as 6:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Savino David DeSantiago
Defendant:
Donald Scales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01537
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ros v. Davenport et al
as 6:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Russell Ros
Defendant:
Trisha Davenport, Joshua Highberger, Gerald Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walls v. Gold et al
as 6:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Tracy Walls
Defendant:
Donald Gold and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
D.A. v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
D. A.
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Josh Highberger, Brandon Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Asbill v. Kelly
as 6:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Travis Donald Asbill
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gosney v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv01511
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen Gosney
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Dr. Warren Roberts, Dr. Thomas Bristol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv00852
Defendant:
Craig Prins, Brent Eriksen, Tanya Weleber and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
