Cases 31 - 40 of 13,155
Raymond Douglas Hardy v. Singleton et al
as 1:2024cv01062
Defendant:
Carla Gibson, Public Defender Andrew Best and Judge Spencer Singleton
Plaintiff:
Raymond Douglas Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLAYTON v. KEMP et al
as 5:2024cv00320
Defendant:
JEFFERY, DIRECTOR HATCHER, CO CLAYTON and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Huckfeldt v. Huckfeldt et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Defendant:
Dr. Gary Keller and Bruce William Huckfeldt, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Brian Andrew Huckfeldt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELLS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01239
Defendant:
CHARLIE FOX, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC., ANDREW COLE and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott (PS) v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv02108
Defendant:
Mrs. Gonzales, Tiffany J. Preston, Colette Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Mason Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis v. Hill
as 3:2024cv01643
Petitioner:
Andrew Hollis
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews, Shelton v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv14305
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Shelton Michael Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blackmun v. Oakland County Jail
as 2:2024cv12410
Defendant:
Oakland County Jail
Plaintiff:
Andrew Blackmun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00499
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew Harris
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Defendant:
CO 1 Unknown Riley, Sgt. Unknown Heth, Andrew Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Quinton Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
