Cases 41 - 50 of 2,085
Curran v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00691
Petitioner:
John F. Curran
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Officer John Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Michelle Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrum v. Knox County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Knox County, Tennessee, Captain Josh Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Byrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Watwood et al
as 1:2024cv01110
Defendant:
Frank Strata, Bargery Gonzales, Brandon Watwood and others
Plaintiff:
John Eric Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00611
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Marcus V. Green
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Mack Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Toby Whitaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
