Cases 51 - 60 of 80
v. Richardson et al
as 3:2010cv01288
Defendant:
Nick Armenakis, Elliot Brody, Mike Cozner and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waite v. Jordet et al
as 3:2010cv01253
Defendant:
Scott Fritz and Judith Jordet
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Waite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waite et al v. DeCamp
as 3:2010cv01217
Respondent:
Joseph DeCamp
Petitioner:
Gary Mark Waite and Andrew Elias Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Waite et al v. Franke et al
as 6:2010cv01096
Plaintiff:
Marcelino R. Avina-Norris and Gary Mark Waite
Defendant:
Sgt. Davis, Captain Davis, Superintendent Franke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maidens v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00874
Defendant:
Brendon Alexander, Sgt. Cook, A. Hannon and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Maidens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Retherford v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv00517
Respondent:
Captain Mike Alexander, Aaron Fehon, Deputy Johnson & Deputies et al and others
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Retherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waite v. Sylier
as 3:2009cv01088
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Waite
Defendant:
Lt. B.K. Sylier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaglethunder v. Board of Parole
as 3:2009cv00958
Petitioner:
Gary Dean Eaglethunder
Respondent:
Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waite v. Multnomah County District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2009cv00839
Plaintiff:
Gary Mark Waite
Defendant:
Multnomah County District Attorney's Office, Kevin Demer and Eric Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
