Cases 1 - 10 of 522
Preston v. Maryland House of Correction-Jessup
as 1:2024cv02688
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Preston
Defendant:
Maryland House of Correction-Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Corizon/Yes Care et al
as 1:2024cv02488
Defendant:
Medical Services, Richard Roderick, Jeffrey Nines and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Richard Forbes
Defendant:
Medical Supervisor and Warden Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Msp. Trooper D et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Defendant:
DPSCS Mailrooms, Det. Sgt. Ryan Shifflet, Sgt. Richard Hauge and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Tapia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurston v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
Richard Thurston
Respondent:
Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Blevins et al
as 1:2023cv03535
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Peters
Defendant:
Richard Blevins, Richard Elliott and Christina Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Tyler et al
as 1:2023cv03500
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Peters
Defendant:
Major Christina Tyler, Richard Blevins and Jr. Richard Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Keyser v. Epps et al
as 1:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
Richard Keyser
Defendant:
Antonio Epps and King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Hall et al
as 1:2023cv03221
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant:
Frank Hall, Maryland Parole Commission and Richard L. Lonhom Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv02754
Plaintiff:
Richard C Washington
Defendant:
T Wolfe, Stephawn Tate, Matthew Lipscomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
