Cases 21 - 30 of 40
1st Source Bank v. L & H Grading Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00456
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Defendant:
L&H Grading Inc and James Beck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1st Source Bank v. Bistodeau
as 3:2010cv00339
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Defendant:
Lawrence H Bistodeau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary Indiana City of v. Barden et al
as 2:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
Gary Indiana City of
Defendant:
Don H Barden , Kirk Saylor , Ed Fasulo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CEDAR CITY AMUSEMENTS, LLC v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY 4-H FAIR, INC.
as 1:2010cv00392
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY 4-H FAIR, INC.
Plaintiff:
CEDAR CITY AMUSEMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Holler et al v. Materials Inspection & Testing Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ralph H Holler and Linda Holler
Defendant:
Materials Inspection & Testing Inc and Timothy Reams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Trane US Inc v. Plazek et al
as 1:2009cv00338
Plaintiff:
Trane US Inc
Defendant:
Paul H Plazek, Paul H Plazek, Paul H Plazek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Shen v. Cammllarie
as 1:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ting-Chang Shen
Defendant:
Jeffrey H Cammllarie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CONSECO INSURANCE COMPANY v. CARNES
as 1:2009cv00499
Plaintiff:
CONSECO INSURANCE COMPANY and CONSECO INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
H. GENE CARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CENTER CAPITAL CORPORATION v. COOK et al
as 1:2008cv01692
Plaintiff:
CENTER CAPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
BENJAMIN H. COOK and ANDREW J. COOK
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Somers v. FedEx Home Delivery
as 3:2008cv00575
Plaintiff:
Richard H Somers, II and Richard H Somers, II
Defendant:
FedEx Home Delivery, FedEx Home Delivery and FedEx Home Delivery
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
