Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lanier et al v. Princeton Baptist Medical Center et al
as 2:2016cv01976
Plaintiff:
Maybelline C Lanier and Johnny Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Princeton Baptist Medical Center, Baptist Health Systems, Avectus Healthcare Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes et al v. Shelby Baptist Medical Center et al
as 2:2016cv01932
Plaintiff:
Patricia Barnes , Alexander Barnes and Loyd Ekstrand
Defendant:
Shelby Baptist Medical Center, Baptist Health Systems, Avectus Healthcare Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sumeru Health Care Group, L.C. v. Michael Hutchens, et al
as 15-5788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUMERU HEALTH CARE GROUP, L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HUTCHENS, Individually and As Administrator of the Claiborne County Hospital, CLAIBORNE COUNTY HOSPITAL and BAPTIST HEALTH SYSTEM OF EAST TENNESSEE, INC.
Gaskill et al v VHS San Antonio Partners, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00665
Defendant:
Baptist Health System, North Central Baptist Hospital, Graham Reeve and others
Plaintiff:
Harold V. Gaskill, III, M.D. and Harold V. Gaskill, III, M.D. P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Hospital Housekeeping Systems, Ltd. v. Baptist Health System
as 1:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Hospital Housekeeping Systems, Ltd. and Hospital Housekeeping Systems, Ltd.
Defendant:
Baptist Health System and Baptist Health System
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Managed Care Solutions, Inc. v. Baptist Health System, Inc.
as 0:2007cv61263
Plaintiff:
Managed Care Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Baptist Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Sumeru Health Care v. Hutchens, et al
as 3:2002cv00447
Plaintiff:
Sumeru Health Care Group, L.C.
Defendant:
Michael Hutchens , Claiborne County Hospital and Baptist Health Systems of East Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
