Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00689
Plaintiff:
Margaret Picus, Margaret Picus and Margaret Picus
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Menu Foods Inc., Del Monte Foods Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Monk v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
Paula Monk, Paula Monk and Paula Monk
Defendant:
Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Boyer v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00746
Plaintiff:
Tony Boyer, Tony Boyer and Tony Boyer
Defendant:
Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Brenton v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00747
Plaintiff:
Norman Brenton, Norman Brenton and Norman Brenton
Defendant:
Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Eilers v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00749
Plaintiff:
Teresa Eilers, Teresa Eilers and Teresa Eilers
Defendant:
Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Nagel v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00748
Plaintiff:
Lynda Nagel, Lynda Nagel and Lynda Nagel
Defendant:
Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dineen v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00686
Plaintiff:
Lerae Dineen and Lerae Dineen
Defendant:
Menu Foods and Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Adams v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00685
Plaintiff:
Michelle Adams and Michelle Adams
Defendant:
Menu Foods and Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Percy v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00690
Plaintiff:
Helen Percy and Helen Percy
Defendant:
Menu Foods and Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Weitz v. Menu Foods
as 2:2007cv00684
Plaintiff:
Linda Weitz and Linda Weitz
Defendant:
Menu Foods and Menu Foods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
