Cases 31 - 39 of 39
EVERYTHING YOGURT BRANDS, LLC v. M.A.R. AIR FOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04847
Plaintiff:
EVERYTHING YOGURT BRANDS, LLC
Defendant:
M.A.R. AIR FOODS, INC., RAM SINGLA, JOHN DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JOHNNY POPPER, INC. et al v. BYRIDER FRANCHISING, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv02091
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY POPPER, INC. and CNAC, LLC
Defendant:
BYRIDER FRANCHISING, INC., JOHN DOES (1-10) and ABC BUSINESSES (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. TAMPA
as 2:2009cv01916
Plaintiff:
WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN TAMPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. BOONSLICK LODGE, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00990
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
BOONSLICK LODGE, LLC and JOHN PORTER
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. FOUR J.S. FAMILY LLLP et al
as 2:2008cv04720
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
FOUR J.S. FAMILY LLLP and JOHN D. PEZOLD
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CHOI v. AJA, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv02329
Plaintiff:
KILYOUNG CHOI
Defendant:
AJA, LLC, BOSTON'S BEST ICE CREAM, INC., EMACK AND BOLIO'S OF NEWBURY STREET, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SHERLES v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00972
Plaintiff:
GREG SHERLES
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC. and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ANI ASSOCIATES, INC. v. PROMUS HOTELS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05609
Plaintiff:
ANI ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
PROMUS HOTELS, INC., PROMUS OPERATING COMPANY, INC., PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. FAMILY ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 2:2007cv02714
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
FAMILY ENTERPRISES LLC and JOHN PROZERALIK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
