Cases 11 - 18 of 18
WOLK v. OVERLAWYERED.COM et al
as 2:2010cv05856
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR ALAN WOLK
Defendant:
OVERLAWYERED.COM, THE OVERLAWYERED GROUP, WALTER K. OLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Hosage v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
as 3:2010cv01026
Plaintiff:
Paul J Hosage
Defendant:
City of Wilkes-Barre, Wilkes-Barre City Police Department, Gerald E Dessoye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. DONNELLY STEEN & COMPANY et al
as 5:2010cv01905
Plaintiff:
NANCY K. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DONNELLY STEEN & COMPANY, MICHAEL E. DONNELLY and ROBERT STEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winston v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv00867
Plaintiff:
Michael Winston
Defendant:
Edward Rendell, Tom Corbett, Frank E Pawlowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL et al v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2009cv05002
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. MITCHELL and LAURETTA EDWARDS-MITCHELL
Defendant:
BESSIE L. WILLIAMS YOUNG and CLARENCE WILLIAMS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
DAVID E. CALLAHAN POOL PLASTERING, INC. v. BLUE HAVEN POOLS NORTHEAST, INC.
as 2:2009cv03984
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. CALLAHAN POOL PLASTERING, INC.
Defendant:
BLUE HAVEN POOLS NORTHEAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MITCHELL et al v. YOUNG
as 2:2009cv03814
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. MITCHELL and LAURETTA EDWARDS-MITCHELL
Defendant:
BESSIE LEFRA YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
AMERICAN CORPORATE SOCIETY, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 2:2008cv00350
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CORPORATE SOCIETY, INC., ANTOINE MAX DENIS, ACS GLOBAK REALTORS, INC. and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES (1-20), JANE DOES (1-20), USCIS VERMONT SERVICE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
