Cases 11 - 20 of 91
v. Goodman Garcia et al
as 2:2021cv01306
Defendant:
Jessyca Goodman Garcia, United States of America and Malco Enterprises of Nevada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Goodman Garcia v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Jessyca Goodman Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America, Micah Gill, Malco Enterprises of Nevada, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01307
Defendant:
Jessyca Goodman Garcia, United States of America, Micah Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Baker v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00933
Plaintiff:
Darlene Baker
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Howard v. United States of America ex rel United States Postal Service
as 2:2021cv00643
Plaintiff:
Joel Kane Howard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hinds v. United States of America Department of the Interior
as 2:2021cv00622
Defendant:
United States of America Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
Leslye Hinds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Tucker v. United States of America ex rel United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Justin Michael Rivera and United States of America ex rel United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Warren Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Mayes et al v. The United States of America
as 2:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mayes and Lucille Lagasse
Interested Party:
Harry Michael Reid
Defendant:
The United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bouari v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
Ghassan Houbous Bouari
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Hawkins v. Unites States of America
as 2:2020cv01273
Defendant:
Unites States of America
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
