Cases 21 - 30 of 130
Charles Quick v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 1:2024cv22679
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
Charles Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Murphy v. AT&T Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01683
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc
Plaintiff:
Paul Murphy MDL-3114
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nguyen v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 5:2024cv03574
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
David Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Murphy v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv02050
Plaintiff:
Paul Murphy
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02732
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Shalace L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Keneshia Brown et al v. Metro By T-Mobile et al
as 2:2024cv01927
Plaintiff:
Keneshia Brown, Kenny Brown, Kendra Brown and others
Defendant:
Metro By T-Mobile, T-Mobile US, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown et al v. Metro By T-Mobile et al
as 2:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Keneshia Brown, Kenny Brown, Kendra Brown and others
Defendant:
Metro By T-Mobile, T-Mobile US, Inc. and Does Does 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Griffin v. T-Mobile
as 6:2023cv05639
Plaintiff:
James A. Griffin
Defendant:
T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
J.N. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv05217
Plaintiff:
J.N.
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc doing business as T-Mobile and Michael L. Adams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Griffin v. T-Mobile
as 6:2023cv04453
Plaintiff:
James A. Griffin
Defendant:
T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
