Cases 41 - 50 of 154
Christiansen et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00297
Plaintiff:
Robyn Christiansen and Gene Christiansen
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Hohenberger v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00295
Plaintiff:
Theresa J. Hohenberger
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Bader v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
Ruth M. Bader
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Morales v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00270
Plaintiff:
Helen Morales
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Doyle et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Dennis M. Doyle and Kathleen A. Doyle
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Clarke v. Wright Medical Group Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
Twyla Clarke
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group Inc and Wright Medical Technology Incorporated
DeJesus et al v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
Cresencio DeJesus and Patricia DeJesus
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Heldenbrand v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Mary Heldenbrand
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Palmer v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Mark Palmer
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Mead v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Martin Mead
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
