Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Garland et al v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Defendant:
Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Reckitt Benckiser LLC
Plaintiff:
Estelita Rey, Chelsea Garland and Zachary Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Lafayette v. Owens et al
as 8:2024cv01383
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Lafayette, Sr., Keron Enslow, Florida Department of Revenue Child Support and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Lafayette, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garland et al v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Garland and Leroy Jacobs
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Solid ISG Capital US Inc. et al v. Jacob et al
as 1:2023cv04647
Defendant:
Tamar Perry, Michael Jacob, Neil Duggan and others
Plaintiff:
Solid ISG Capital US Inc. and Recap Chelsea Investment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Gaarder v. Webster University
as 4:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Gaarder
Defendant:
Webster University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gaarder v. Webster University
as 4:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Gaarder
Defendant:
Webster University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MEZA v. Coty, Inc.
as 5:2022cv05291
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE MEZA and Chelsea Garland
Defendant:
Coty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Frederick v. Perrigo Company
as 3:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Frederick
Defendant:
Perrigo Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Commodore v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
as 7:2022cv06247
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Commodore
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Louis Abramson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05041
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown, Louis Abramson, John Ackley and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
