Cases 21 - 30 of 689
Clarke v. City of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2024cv01046
Defendant:
Chris Stacey, Brenda Larsen-Mitchell, Clark County School District Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Karyl Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Defendant:
Meghan Lutz, Matthew Pynn, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIERCE v. SPRUILL et al
as 2:2024cv07234
Defendant:
JACQUAN SPRUILL and STACEY WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
DA'SHON PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. MNSF II WI LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01499
Defendant:
MNSF II WI LLC, Valex Amos, Dana NLN and others
Plaintiff:
Kasha Louise Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morin v. Alliance TSP, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02420
Defendant:
Alliance TSP, Inc., Stacey Eaton and Carlos Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Nicklas Morin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Bains et al
as 1:2024cv02102
Defendant:
Daniele Cathey, Wellpath, LLC, Kara Padgett and others
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Smith and Nickeil Bethea-Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Uhrig v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Defendant:
Trooper C Johnson, Tropper William Howard, Charles W. Kuster and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Uhrig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Merriweather v. Papillion
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Stacey Papillion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rundquist: v. Crane et al
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Scott-Gregory Rundquist:
Defendant:
Sue Crane, Family Support Division, Andrew Bailey and others
Flanagan v. Johnston et al
as 3:2024cv05313
Plaintiff:
Martha Marie Flanagan
Defendant:
Kelly R Johnston, Stacey R Denham, A Hitchcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
