Cases 61 - 70 of 165
MARIN v. FORD CITY PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00791
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
FORD CITY PENNSYLVANIA and FORD CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARIN v. THE U.S. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2015cv00792
Defendant:
THE U.S. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION, ANDREW REID and THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT et al v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2015cv01346
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT, SR. and DAVID L. SINGLETON
Defendant:
PETE HERMAN MATTHEWS, BOBBY DAVIS, MIKE KEB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v Grand Rapids Public School District et al
as 1:2015cv00258
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Tyson
Defendant:
Grand Rapids Public School District, Teresa Weatherall Neal, Bernard Colton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CANNADY v. STATE OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
VINCENT CANNADY
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSOURI, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI BOARD OF CURATORS, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mel Marin v. La Paloma Healthcare Center, et al
as 14-4355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL M. MARIN, PERSONALLY AND AS HEIR OF THE ESTATE OF MILIVOJ AND EVA MARINKOVIC
Defendant - Appellee:
LA PALOMA HEALTHCARE CENTER, AND IT'S ALTER EGOS, ITALIAN MAPLE HOLDINGS, PLUM HEALTHCARE GROUP and others
Blomenkamp v. Freeburg et al
as 3:2014cv00860
Plaintiff:
John Blomenkamp
Defendant:
Village of Freeburg, Ray Danford, Dennis Herzing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daigre v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv01980
Plaintiff:
Christian Daigre
Defendant:
Mel Davis , Tyrone Ward , James E. Coffey, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain v. Mandl College of Allied Health et al
as 1:2014cv01729
Plaintiff:
Ileen Cain
Defendant:
Mandl College of Allied Health and Mel Weiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
