Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Peter R. Tia v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv07085
Defendant:
Halawa Correctional Facility and Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Peter R. Tia v. Core Civic et al
as 2:2019cv04545
Defendant:
Core Civic, Corrections Corporation of America Inc., Core Civic Mormon Mafias and others
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. State of California et al
as 2:2017at00085
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, La Palma Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Juarez Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRIETA v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2016at00859
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE MURRIETA
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc., CORRECTIONS OFFICER A. HANSEN and CORRECTIONS OFFICER HIGHTOWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murrieta v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01552
Plaintiff:
Catherine Murrieta
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc., A. Hansen and Hightower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anatol Tekmar v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2012cv01330
Defendant:
Karen Bannette, Officer Bennett, Nurse Mike Colgatte and others
Plaintiff:
Anatol Tekmar
Sandres v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 1:2009at00730
Plaintiff:
Terry M Sandres
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America and Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Robin S Martin v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2008cv01105
Plaintiff:
Robin S Martin
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, United States Comptrollers Office, California Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
