Voting Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 216
Stringer et al v. Hughs et al
as 5:2020cv00046
Plaintiff: John Harms, League of Women Voters of Texas, Nayeli Gomez and others
Defendant: Ruth Hughs, Steven C. McCraw and Carlos H. Cascos
Intervenor Plaintiff: Texas Democratic Party, DCCC and DSCC
Not Classified By Court: P. Michael Curry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atkins et al v. Sarasota County Florida et al
as 8:2019cv03048
Defendant: Sarasota County Florida, Michael A Moran, Alan Maio and others
Plaintiff: Mary Mack, Michael White and Fredd Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Brewster et al v. Berger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00037
Defendant: Phillip E. Berger, David C. Black, Timothy K. Moore and others
Plaintiff: Larry E. Norman, Billy Joe Brewster, Jr., Thomas L. Hill and others
Intervenor Defendant: Richard R. Crews, Gettys Cohen Jr., Donald Rumph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of Michigan et al v. Benson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv14148
Plaintiff: League of Women Voters of Michigan, William "Bill" J. Grasha, Roger J. Brdak and others
Defendant: Ruth Johnson, Republican Congressional Delegation, Lee Chatfield and others
Petitioner: William F. Carney, Jeff Cobb, Shelly Edgerton and others
Interested Party: Robert LaBrant, Michigan Chamber of Commerce, Robert I. Schostak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ghiles et al v. Municipal Electoral Board/Commissioners of Chicago Heights, IL. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01775
Defendant: Lori Wilcox, Wanda Rogers, Municipal Electoral Board/Commissioners of Chicago Heights, IL. and others
Plaintiff: Angela M. Mattio, Jason M. Amos, Sebastian C. Ghiles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. COOPER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff: WINSTON SALEM - FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP and others
Defendant: KEN RAYMOND, STELLA ANDERSON, JAY HEMPHILL and others
Intervenor Defendant: Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
One Wisconsin Institute, Inc. et al v. Nichol, Gerald et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00324
Plaintiff: One Wisconsin Institute, Inc. , Citizen Action of Wisconsin Education Fund, Inc. , Renee M. Gagner and others
Defendant: Gerald C. Nichol , Elsa Lamelas , Thomas Barland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Montana Green Party et al v. Stapleton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00087
Plaintiff: Tamara R. Thompson, Doug Campbell, Antonio Morsette and others
Defendant: Corey Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Judicial Watch, Inc., et al v. California Common Cause, et al
as 18-56105
Plaintiff - Appellee: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT, WOLFGANG KUPKA and others
Defendant: DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as the Registrar-Recorded/County Clerk of Los Angeles County, California and ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as the California Secretary of State
Movant - Appellant: CALIFORNIA COMMON CAUSE, Proposed Defendant-Intervenor
Judicial Watch, Inc., et al v. Mi Familia Vota Education Fund, et al
as 18-56102
Plaintiff - Appellee: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT, WOLFGANG KUPKA and others
Defendant: DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as the Registrar-Recorded/County Clerk of Los Angeles County, California and ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as the California Secretary of State
Movant - Appellant: MI FAMILIA VOTA EDUCATION FUND, ROCK THE VOTE and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF LOS ANGELES, Proposed Defendant-Intervenors

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?