Cases 1 - 8 of 8
USA v. City of Pawtucket, et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Defendant:
Edward Catone, Jr., Kenneth R. McGill, City of Pawtucket and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Goldin et al v. Restrepo et al
as 1:2020cv00262
Defendant:
Janice Pucci, Diane C. Mederos, Edward Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Acosta, Jeanine Calkin, Gayle Goldin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Daly et al v. Tennant et al
as 3:2016cv08981
Plaintiff:
Naomi Spencer Daly and Darrell Castle
Defendant:
Natalie Tennant and Brian Wood
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Dorrel W. Arthur
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pepper Draper et al v State of Arizona et al
as 8:2012cv01602
Plaintiff:
Grant Abbot, William O Abright, Justin Ahrens and others
Defendant:
State of Indiana, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Chuck Baldwin, et al v. Pedro Corte
as 09-2227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUCK BALDWIN, DARREL R. CASTLE, WESLEY THOMPSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PEDRO A. CORTES, ,Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in his official capacity
Chuck Baldwin, et al v. Pedro Corte
as 08-4117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUCK BALDWIN, DARREL R. CASTLE, WESLEY THOMPSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PEDRO A. CORTES, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in his official capacity
Baldwin et al v. Cortes
as 1:2008cv01626
Plaintiff:
Chuck Baldwin, Chuck Baldwin, Chuck Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Pedro A. Cortes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Libertarian Party of Tennessee et al v. Thompson et al
as 3:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Libertarian Party of Tennessee, Libertarian Party of Tennessee, Anthony Wall and others
Defendant:
Brook Thompson and Riley Darnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
