Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Donald McCants, et al v. Thomas Betlach, et al
as 10-16193
Plaintiff:
SHARON NEWTON-NATIONS, MANUELA GONZALEZ, CHERYL BILBREY and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD MCCANTS, PATRICIA JONES, ANNE GARRISON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS BETLACH, Director of the Arizona Health Care Containment System and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Human Services, in their official capacities
Quiles-Olivo v Estado Libre Asociado de P.R.
as 3:2009cv02228
Plaintiff:
Franklin Quiles-Olivo
Defendant:
Estado Libre Asociado de P.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mary Immel v. Douglas Lumpkin
as 09-3182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY IMMEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS E. LUMPKIN, in his official capacity as Director of the Franklin County Department of Job and Family Services
Columbus Rehabilitation & Suba, et al v. Franklin County Department of, et al
as 09-3069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLUMBUS REHABILITATION & SUBACUTE INSTITUTE and KAREN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, DOUGLAS E. LUMPKIN, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES and others
Columbus Rehabilitation & Subacute Institute et al v. Franklin County Department of Job and Family Services et al
as 2:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Columbus Rehabilitation & Subacute Institute, Columbus Rehabilitation & Subacute Institute, Karen Brown and others
Defendant:
Franklin County Department of Job and Family Services, Douglas E Lumpkin, Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Newton-Nations, et al v. Betlach, et al
as 2:2003cv02506
Plaintiff:
Sharon Newton-Nations , Manuela Gonzalez , Cheryl Bilbrey and others
Defendant:
Anthony Rogers , Michael O. Leavitt and Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
