Cases 1 - 10 of 42
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. MGM Affair, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01103
Defendant:
MGM Affair, LLC doing business as Detour doing business as Detour Domain and Michael A. Sanchez doing business as Detour doing business as Detour Domain
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Bar Sante Fe LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02110
Defendant:
Gerardo Sanchez doing business as Mi Raza Bar & Grill and Bar Sante Fe LLC doing business as Mi Raza Bar & Grill
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca Federal Question: Federal Communications Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 685 Backyard LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
685 Backyard LLC d/b/a 685 Backyard and Maria Sara Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. MAVF Investments LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
MAVF Investments LLC doing business as Don Pedro Mexican Restaurant, Miguel A. Vicencio doing business as Don Pedro Mexican Restaurant, Amado C. Sanchez doing business as Don Pedro Mexican Restaurant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. MGM Affair, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01438
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
MGM Affair, LLC d/b/a Detour Domain, d/b/a Detour, and d/b/a Detour Domain Neighborhood Bar, Michael A. Sanchez and MGM Affair, LLC doing business as Detour Domain doing business as Detour doing business as Detour Domain Neighborhood Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Bar Sante Fe LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Bar Sante Fe LLC Individually doing business as Mi Raza Bar & Grill and Gerardo Sanchez Individually doing business as Mi Raza Bar & Grill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1131 ca Federal Question: Federal Communications Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Machinegun Michaels, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2022cv01388
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Machinegun Michaels, L.L.C. d/b/a Detour, d/b/a Detour Bar, and d/b/a Detour Austin, Michael A. Sanchez, Toni N. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Daniel M. Molano
as 5:2022cv01273
Defendant:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc., Daniel M. Molano doing business as Sabor De Sanchez and Daniel M. Molano individually, and d/b/a Sabor De Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media as Broadcast Licensee of the September 5, 2021 Paraguay v. Columbia South American World Cup Qualifying Match
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Heladas Ice House LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01836
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Heladas Ice House LLC as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program doing business as Heladas Ice House, Enrique Sanchez as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program doing business as Heladas Ice House, Erik Sanchez as Broadcast Licensee of the June 8, 2019 Gennady GGG Golovkin II v. Steve Rolls Championship Fight Program, doing business as Heladas Ice House and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Texas Muay Thai LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01742
Defendant:
Texas Muay Thai LLC d/b/a Texas Muay Thai, Lee O. Sanchez, Benito Arriaga and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
