Cases 111 - 120 of 158
Taylor v. McQuiggin et al
as 2:2009cv12288
Respondent:
Greg McQuiggin and Michigan Department of Corrections - Parole Board
Petitioner:
Richard Taylor
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Norton v. Michigan Department of Corrections' Parole Board
as 2:2008cv15301
Petitioner:
Michael Norton
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections' Parole Board
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ernest Jones v. Blaine Lafler
as 08-2588
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNEST SIDNEY JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
BLAINE C. LAFLER, Warden, named as "Michigan Department of Corrections"
Mosley Russell v. MDOC
as 08-2495
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOSLEY L. RUSSELL
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gary Osborn v. MDOC, et al
as 08-2468
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY M. OSBORN
Respondent:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
Osborn #215953 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00245
Petitioner:
Gary Michael Osborn #215953
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, John Rubitschun and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Osborn v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2008cv14073
Petitioner:
Gary Osborn
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, John Rubitschun and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Robinson v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board
as 2:2008cv13975
Petitioner:
Francisco Robinson
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Thompson v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2008cv13942
Petitioner:
Stanford Thompson
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Rambus v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2008cv13888
Petitioner:
Wesley Rambus
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
