Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Murphy v. State of Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 3:2019cv00487
Petitioner:
Michael A. Murphy
Respondent:
State of Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00111
Petitioner:
William Walker
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Corrections and Tennessee Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mayberry v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01276
Petitioner:
Christopher Scott Mayberry
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tony Parker and Darren Settles
Defendant:
Terease Gettner and Greg Turpster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leggs v. Genovese et al
as 3:2016cv02069
Petitioner:
Mario A. Leggs
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese, Tennessee Department of Correction and Tennessee Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cable v. Tenn. Department of Correction
as 2:2014cv00332
Petitioner:
John Franklin Cable
Respondent:
Tenn. Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv02652
Petitioner:
Jerome Williams
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Schofield et al
as 3:2014cv01612
Petitioner:
Jerome Williams
Respondent:
Derrick Schofield and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eidson v. Weatherford et al
as 3:2014cv01408
Petitioner:
Gregory Stephen Eidson
Respondent:
Sonny Weatherford, Tennessee Department of Corrections and Derrick Schofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Danielle M White
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Corrections Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ra-El v. Shelby County Department of Corrections
as 2:2013cv02968
Petitioner:
Khaliq Ra-El
Respondent:
Shelby County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
