Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Gutierrez-Andrade v. Hollingsworth
as 3:2010cv00102
Petitioner:
Henry Gutierrez-Andrade
Respondent:
Lisa J.W. Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry v. Ryker et al
as 1:2009cv06000
Petitioner:
Gary Henry
Respondent:
Lee Ryker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Thomas et al
as 1:2009cv02552
Petitioner:
Joey James Hicks
Respondent:
Linda Thomas and Warden Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hersman v. People of the State of Illinois et al
as 3:2009cv00118
Petitioner:
Henry Hersman
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Shaw et al
as 1:2009cv00382
Petitioner:
Henry E Miller
Respondent:
Frank L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Manrique v. Chandler et al
as 4:2008cv04071
Plaintiff:
Armando Manrique
Defendant:
Nedra Chandler, Henry County and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Broughton v. Gatez et al
as 1:2008cv06935
Petitioner:
Henry Broughton
Respondent:
Donald Gatez and Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Cook County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Pearlman et al
as 2:2008cv02143
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Louis J Pearlman, Henry Samueli, Raffaello Follieri and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Evans et al
as 1:2008cv01178
Petitioner:
Henry C. Hill
Respondent:
John Evans, Roger Walker, Mike Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaczmarek v. Hulick et al
as 1:2007cv06126
Petitioner:
Henry Kaczmarek
Respondent:
Donald Hulick and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
