Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Martinez v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 4:2016cv00731
Petitioner:
Raul Rene Martinez
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lunsford v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 2:2016cv03216
Petitioner:
Gregory Joe Lunsford
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Inzunza v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 2:2016cv01337
Petitioner:
Gildardo Gonzales Inzunza
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv01515
Petitioner:
Richard Morris Clark
Respondent:
Carla Jones and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hughes v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00347
Plaintiff:
Carla Hughes
Defendant:
Marshall L. Fisher , Joann Shivers and Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luis Sanchez-Alfonso v. Board of parole and Post-Priso, et al
as 14-35698
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUIS SANCHEZ-ALFONSO
Respondent - Appellee:
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION and CARLA PINTO, Probation Officer
Sanchez-Alfonso v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision et al
as 3:2014cv01002
Respondent:
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and Carla Pinto
Petitioner:
Luis Sanchez-Alfonso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TOWLES vs. GLOVER et al
as 5:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
LARAN DENARD TOWLES
Defendant:
CARLA GLOVER ROBERTSON, BELLE, REGISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craine v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2014cv00037
Petitioner:
Carla G. Craine
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craine v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2014cv00035
Petitioner:
Carla Craine
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
