Cases 51 - 60 of 282
Mowery v. Jones
as 5:2013cv00667
Petitioner:
James Randall Mowery, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Webb v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
Christopher Wayne Webb
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Wilkinson
as 5:2013cv00628
Petitioner:
Michael W Wood
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colburn v. Jones
as 6:2013cv00250
Petitioner:
Ray D. Colburn
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Eckardt v. Miller
as 5:2013cv00602
Petitioner:
Kyle Richard Eckardt
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simon v. Jones
as 5:2013cv00563
Petitioner:
Ramon Simon
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Troutt v. Jones
as 5:2013cv00540
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Troutt
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00551
Petitioner:
Danny Wilson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winrow v. Jones
as 5:2013cv00537
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Winrow
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christian v. Jones et al
as 5:2013cv00501
Petitioner:
George Allen Christian, Jr
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
