Cases 1 - 10 of 1,146
Baker v. Dade County Prosecutors
as 1:2024cv23689
Petitioner:
Zaequan Baker
Respondent:
Dade County Prosecutors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. BRITTAIN et al
as 5:2024cv05122
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KATHY BRITTAIN
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PATRICK BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker, Zaequan v. Dade County Prosecutors
as 1:2024cv23422
Defendant:
Dade County Prosecutors
Plaintiff:
Zaequan Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Michael R. Baker, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Lovett
as 6:2024cv00120
Respondent:
Lovett
Petitioner:
Dennis R. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAKER v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07969
Petitioner:
ANDRE BAKER
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAKER v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv03143
Respondent:
R. IRWIN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
JOSEPH D. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knutson v. Levitt/Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00095
Respondent:
A-3 Unit Manager Lewis, J. Gilley, SiS Lt. Smith and others
Petitioner:
Todd Seaver Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker v. State of Alaska
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Jeramy Lee Baker
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
