Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Baker v. Hinds County Circuit Court
as 3:2021cv00203
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Hinds County Circuit Court and Sheriff Lee D. Vance
Plaintiff:
Marcus Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2019cv00679
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Juventric Shaw and Sheriff Jacob Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2018cv00564
Defendant:
Prosecutor Mary Cotton, Judge Benny K. Warrington, Sheriff Investigator Terry Gann and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Earl Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baker v. Watson et al
as 3:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
Richard Baker
Defendant:
Brian Watson, Mississippi State Of, Yazoo County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baker v. Crocket et al
as 1:2013cv00097
Petitioner:
Kenneth Baker
Respondent:
Johnny Crocket and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dearing v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
D'Wayne Dearing
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Larry G. Baker, Monroe County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Abrams et al
as 1:2010cv00458
Plaintiff:
Butch Baker
Defendant:
Chuck Abrams and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collins v. Lewis et al
as 2:2010cv00118
Petitioner:
James Collins
Respondent:
Cassandra L. Lewis, Micheal Horan, David L. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dearing v. Monroe County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2010cv00055
Petitioner:
D'Wayne Dearing
Respondent:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Dusty Rollison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
