General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 424
Richard Salmon v. Brad Cain, et al
as 23-35137
Petitioner / Appellant: RICHARD W. SALMON
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional Institution and OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
Respondent: MARK NOOTH, OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE and ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, The Attorney General of the State
Victor Santos-Ek v. Mark Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35578
Petitioner / Appellant: VICTOR ASUNCION SANTOS-EK
Respondent / Appellee: MARK NOOTH
Tad Bradley v. Mark Nooth
as 22-35494
Petitioner / Appellant: TAD BRADLEY
Respondent / Appellee: MARK NOOTH, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional institution
Eduardo Alvarez-Vega v. Mark Nooth
as 22-35223
Petitioner / Appellant: EDUARDO ALVAREZ-VEGA
Respondent / Appellee: MARK NOOTH
Dayten Hopkins, Sr. v. Mark Nooth
as 22-35077
Petitioner / Appellant: DAYTEN CORDELL HOPKINS, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee: MARK NOOTH, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Institution
James Knox v. Mark Nooth
as 22-35017
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES CLARK KNOX
Respondent / Appellee: MARK NOOTH
Salmon v. Nooth et al
as 2:2020cv00280
Respondent: Oregon Board of Parole, Ellen F. Rosenblum and Mark Nooth
Petitioner: Richard W. Salmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Nooth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv01747
Petitioner: Kalei Aloha Morris
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santos-ek v. Nooth
as 2:2018cv01565
Petitioner: Victor Asuncion Santos-Ek
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Salmon v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 18-35745
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD W. SALMON, AKA Richard Wayne Salmor, AKA Richard William Solman
Respondent - Appellee: MARK NOOTH, Superintendent of SRCI and OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?