Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Koenck v. Bolar et al.
as 4:2023cv00947
Petitioner:
Timothy P. Koenck
Respondent:
Acting Warden J. Bolar, U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Federal Correctional Institute - Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boone v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv01363
Petitioner:
Richard P. Boone
Respondent:
State of Ohio and Lorain County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estes v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00166
Petitioner:
Joshua P Estes
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estes v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv02466
Petitioner:
Joshua P Estes
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tricaso v. Warden, Federal Correctional Insitute Elkton
as 5:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Michael P. Tricaso
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Correctional Insitute Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Krug v. Sheldon
as 1:2020cv02280
Petitioner:
Jon P. Krug
Respondent:
Warden Ed Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Solis-Martinez v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
Attorney General William P. Barr, Rebecca Adducci, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Cristhian Jared Solis-Martinez
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr and others
Honnigford v. Williams
as 4:2020cv00873
Respondent:
Warden Mark Williams
Petitioner:
John P. Honnigford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Avery v. Wooten et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Gary Sneed, Lisa Cooke, David Dobbins and others
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ellis v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 1:2019cv00805
Respondent:
Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
James P Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
