Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Pearson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee)
as 8:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Everett Pearson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Warden, Miami FCI
as 0:2023cv60528
Plaintiff:
David Pearson
Defendant:
Warden, Miami FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pearson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv23812
Plaintiff:
Franklin Pearson
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson, Jr. v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00389
Petitioner:
George Pearson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pearson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv00603
Petitioner:
Franklin Pearson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Chronister (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2021cv01165
Petitioner:
Vernon Jewel Pearson, III
Respondent:
Chad Chronister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pearson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv20306
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Franklin Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2020cv00283
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Petitioner:
David Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pearson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2020cv00045
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Angelo C Pearson, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEARSON v. INCH
as 4:2020cv00008
Respondent:
MARK S INCH
Petitioner:
ANGELO C PEARSON, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
