General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Davis v. Doory et al
as 1:2022cv00588
Petitioner: Thomas Isiah Davis
Respondent: Timothy J. Doory, Steven Crowley, Thomas Ports and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomlin v. State of Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00145
Petitioner: Nancy Lynn Tomlin
Respondent: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomlin v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02086
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner: John Henry Tomlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hodges v. State of Hawaii We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00323
Petitioner: Harold Tomlin Hodges, Jr.
Respondent: State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clarence Tomlin, Jr. v. J. Soto
as 16-16999
Petitioner - Appellant: CLARENCE TOMLIN, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: J. SOTO
Tomlin v. Soto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02608
Petitioner: Clarence Tomlin, Jr.
Respondent: J. Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Tomlin v. Harold Clarke
as 15-6226
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL L. TOMLIN
Respondent - Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director, VDOC
Billy Tomlin v. Department of Corrections
as 15-10203
Petitioner - Appellant: BILLY DAVID TOMLIN
Respondent - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
George Tomlin v. Levern Cohen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6589
Petitioner - Appellant: GEORGE LEE TOMLIN
Respondent - Appellee: LEVERN COHEN, Warden Ridgeland Correctional Inst
Respondent: ALAN WILSON, Attorney General
Tomlin v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv24575
Plaintiff: Billy David Tomlin
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?