Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Ploof v. Hines et al
as 1:2013cv00294
Petitioner:
Gary Ploof
Respondent:
Karl Hines and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crew v. Martel et al
as 4:2012cv04259
Petitioner:
Mark Christopher Crew
Respondent:
Michael Martel , Attorney General State of California and Kevin Chappell
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project, Michael Millman, Michael David Laurence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terry v. Byars
as 4:2012cv01798
Petitioner:
Gary DuBose Terry
Respondent:
William R Byars, Jr and Wayne C McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OH Execution Protocol
as 12-3035
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS, et. al.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES L. LORRAINE
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Sutton v. Ricky Bell
as 11-6180
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY WAYNE SUTTON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden
Simmons v. Epps
as 08-70048
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY CARL SIMMONS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Bowles v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2008cv00791
Petitioner:
Gary R. Bowles and Gary R. Bowles
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gary Otte v. Mark Houk
as 08-3247
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY OTTE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK C. HOUK, Warden
Johnson v. Quarterman
as 07-70043
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
