Cases 81 - 90 of 336
ARMSTRONG v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv05125
Defendant:
MS. ANGIE, SERGEANT CHARD, OFFICER GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff:
QUADIR ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOKES v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00121
Defendant:
SARGEANT MORAN, PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CADETT and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI DWIGHT STOKES
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Conway et al
as 2:2020cv00084
Defendant:
Deputy DeJeannie Smith, Dr. Adeshigbin Alaba, Dr. Muhammad S. Hashmi and others
Plaintiff:
Latrice Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Baiardi et al
as 2:2020cv00429
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Timothy F Baiardi and Jeri Williams
Plaintiff:
Roger Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodfin v. Bennett, et al.
as 3:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Adrianna L. Bennett, Brian Moran and Ralph Northern
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Woodfin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOWELL v. MORAN
as 1:2019cv01222
Defendant:
KEVIN MORAN
Plaintiff:
NORMAN F. HOWELL, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2019cv21277
Defendant:
ASST. ADMIN. AMY EMRICH, APN. INAISH JACKSON, INV. RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
AMIR ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilborn v. Bonner et al
as 1:2019cv12050
Defendant:
Shelia Dupre, Tina Hurley, Tonomey Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wilborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence E. Jones v. E. Gollette et al
as 2:2019cv06806
Defendant:
Correctional Officer M. Moran, Correctional Officer S. Khodabakhyshyan, Correctional Officer E. Gollette and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2019cv07340
Plaintiff:
Jordan L. Moore
Defendant:
Police Officer John Doe, Detective John Doe #2, Police Officer Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
