Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAYSE v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN AMANDA BAYSE and ROBERT BAYSE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS, DIRECTOR JAVEL JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clements v. Fulton County Jail Officers et al
as 3:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
Desmond Sullvian Clements
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail Officers, Officer Bougle and Officer Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago et al v. Reynolds
as 1:2021cv00736
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Par, Jaivus Newton, Travis Wilson and others
Defendant:
Frank Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00365
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, PARALEGAL JAMIE A VALLEE, LISA FOUNTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maher v. Adams et al
as 6:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Brian Adams, CERT Sgt. Freddie Davis, Sgt. Michael Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Trouble Maher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clement v. Floyd County Police Dept et al
as 4:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamar Clement
Defendant:
Floyd County Police Dept, et al, Byran McCarley, Jeff Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Todd, et al
as 2:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
Clement Goss
Defendant:
Todd and Forsyth County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Wellls et al
as 6:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Deaundre Malone
Defendant:
William Clements, Officer Ray and Melvin Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Paxton et al
as 2:2010cv00178
Plaintiff:
Clement Goss
Defendant:
Ted Paxton, Todd and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
