Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brooks v. Hawkins County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Dallas Dunn, Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Donnie Ray Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archie Bear v. Dan Hartog, et al
as 23-3693
Plaintiff:
Archie Bear
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
(PC) Brown v. Dirske, et al.
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
Tom Brown
Defendant:
Jeff Dirske, Stanislaus County, Dr. Hoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Dirske, et al.
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Tom Brown
Defendant:
Jeff Dirske, Stanislaus County, Dr. Hoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. Hartog et al
as 4:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rich
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowell v. Hartog et al
as 4:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Darien Crowell
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bear v. Hartog et al
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Archie Robert Bear
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Hartog et al
as 4:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Romeo Hardin
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Talbot et al
as 2:2012cv02207
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Paul Talbot, John Doe, Peter Soe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl H Bond Jr v. Arrowhead Regional Medical Center et al
as 5:2011cv02049
Defendant:
Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, County of San Bernardino and Hoe
Plaintiff:
Earl H Bond, Jr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
