Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Seals v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2012cv02751
Plaintiff:
Gary Seals, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Department of Corrections, Jerrydean Cunningham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. McSwain-Holland et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv00687
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Davidson
Defendant:
Sharon McSwain-Holland, Jesse Youngblood and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBee v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2012cv01029
Plaintiff:
Jerry Randolph McBee
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Jimmy Patrick, Dorthy Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv00171
Defendant:
James Smith, Henri Christian, Larry Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shakur v. Smith et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jah'bambia Omara Shakur
Defendant:
James Smith, Henri Christian, Larry Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdiyyah Alkebulanyahh v. Thierry Nettle
as 11-6987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDIYYAH BEN ALKEBULANYAHH, a/k/a Tyree Alphonso Roberts
Defendant - Appellee:
THIERRY D. NETTLES, Captain, JAMES SMITH, Guard, No 040635, WARDEN MCCABE and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
White v. IDOC et al
as 3:2011cv00200
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker, Christina Castle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. IDOC et al
as 1:2011cv01628
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
IDOC, Roger Walker, Christina Castle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ferguson et al
as 5:2011cv05055
Plaintiff:
Steven James Smith
Defendant:
Keith Ferguson and Dana Winn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MCNEIL
as 3:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARKIECE JACKSON
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, M NICHOLS, W D RUMMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
