Cases 1 - 10 of 255
ACHILLE v. DUVAL et al
as 5:2024cv00180
Defendant:
R. QUINTERO, DUVAL and J. PETTIS
Plaintiff:
RIDGH GENESIS ACHILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman v. Reed et al
as 1:2024cv01285
Defendant:
Ryan Reed, Michael George, Jon Loftus and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Achille v. Duval et al
as 3:2024cv00790
Defendant:
J. Pettis, Duval and R. Quintero
Plaintiff:
Ridgh Genesis Achille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlick v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Defendant:
Nathan Petty, Logan Stender and William Zimmerman
Plaintiff:
Cobretti Matlick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty #283097 v. Horrocks et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gregory Petty #283097
Defendant:
Rebecca Horrocks, Chester Dums, Lance Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Stewart et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Le Tresia Stewart and Robert P. Myers, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Petty
Defendant:
Dr Doe, Nurse Lory Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Matevousain et al
as 1:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Petty
Defendant:
Andre Matevousain, Andrew Ciolli, J. Sturgill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv01432
Petitioner:
Ishmael Petty
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
