Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Greene v. John Does 1-10
as 4:2024cv05308
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
David Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Al-Haqq v. Snow et al
as 2:2024cv04282
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Ms Greene, L. Snow and others
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Sergeant Seabrook et al
as 8:2024cv03621
Defendant:
LT Dabbs and Sergeant Seabrook
Plaintiff:
Jaylyn Green and Jaylyn Joe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Al-Haqq v. Stirling et al
as 2:2024cv02884
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seabrooks v. Richland County et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Seabrooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Richland County, Crayman Harvey, Kevin McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Givens v. Green et al
as 9:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Givens
Defendant:
Green, Cpt. Barnes, Cpt. McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Derrick Henderson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Captain D. Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Green
Defendant:
Mr. Nelson, Mr. Canning, Mr. Campisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Williams et al
as 0:2023cv04299
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane
Defendant:
Joseph Williams (RD), Warden Jackson, Major Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Green v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2023cv03559
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Green
Defendant:
Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
