Cases 1 - 10 of 16
PRONIN v. TUSSEY et al
as 2:2015cv00061
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. F. CARAWAY, MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
DMITRY PRONIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROWN v. DR. WILSON et al
as 1:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LYNN BROWN, Jr.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, J. F. CARAWAY, DR. MICKEY CHO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COLLIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00365
Defendant:
ALL MEMBERS OF THE UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, T. BAILEY, T. BIXLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HALL v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Defendant:
D. ALLRED, BOND HOLDERS/ISSUERS DOES 1-5, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00310
Defendant:
BALLARD, BOOKER, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
JONES v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00239
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, SAWYER and UNKNOWN OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv00122
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, J. F. CARAWAY, JOYCE K. CONLEY and others
Plaintiff:
KURT F. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUPREE v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00092
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
JOHN DUPREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
EDDINGTON v. SAMUELS, JR. et al
as 1:2014cv00463
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, J. F. CARAWAY, DANNA DOBBINS and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EDDINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ARMSTRONG v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
TELLY ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
BOYER, J. F. CARAWAY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
