Cases 1 - 10 of 195
James Munson v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 14-3431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, DONALD GAETZ, Warden/Administrative Officer, Menard Correctional Center, ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 14-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Titus Linton v. Michael Randle, et al
as 14-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS V. LINTON, also known as TUTANKHAMEEN AL-JIHAD AL-SHAYKH AL-JABAL IBN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. RANDLE, EDDIE JONES, Warden, GUY PIERCE and others
Mounson v. Walker et al
as 3:2013cv01192
Plaintiff:
Henry Mounson
Defendant:
Roger E. Walker, Jr., Robert S. Frey, Terry L McCann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Bouchez v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 12-3429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. BOUCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., EDDIE JONES, Warden, SYLVIA MAHONE and others
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 12-2799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Garner v. Pink et al
as 1:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Garner
Defendant:
Shah Vi Pink, Roger E. Walker, Jr, Michael P. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Pink et al
as 1:2011cv08354
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Garner
Defendant:
Shah Vi Pink, Richard Young, A. Guwaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Moran v. Marvin Powers, et al
as 11-3336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL MORAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARVIN F. POWERS, NIGEL VINYARD, ROGER E. WALKER, JR. and others
Richard Ambrose v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 11-3068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. AMBROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., MARK S. CARICH, KAREN SPILMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
