Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Shook v. McNally et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. Shook
Defendant:
Charles J. McNally, Norma Biddix and Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elder v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bennett Elder
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Sergeant Justice Cato, Sergeant John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar v. Shook et al
as 2:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Robert Hayden Salazar
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jacob Shook, Sergeant Abby Yarbrough, Correctional Officer Dylan Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Shook et al
as 2:2023cv02121
Plaintiff:
Jonha Don Bell
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jacob Shook and Parole Officer Ben Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Blitch et al
as 3:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
James Elton Roberts
Defendant:
William B. Blitch, Bayron, Captain Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
Jonha Don Bell
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Dylan Ross, Jail Administrator Jacob Shook and Jailer Coty Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Shook
as 2:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Truman Keith
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jacob Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Shook et al
as 2:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
Joshua Roy Britt
Defendant:
Jacob Shook, Jail Administrator Jacob Shook, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Shook
as 4:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Joshua Roy Britt
Defendant:
Jacob Shook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shook v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Shook, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
