Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Dailey v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv01139
Defendant:
Mrs Morgan, Mr. Hamm, Mr Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Wallace et al
as 2:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Eddie Richards
Defendant:
Reed Wallace, Travis Day, Medical Director Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00480
Defendant:
Jeavon Perry, L Harrison, Phillip Wheat and others
Plaintiff:
John Leslie Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheat, Brandon Loyd v. Snyder
as 2:2024cv14082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Loyd Wheat
Defendant:
Sheriff William L Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackburn v. LeBlanc et al
as 6:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Leonard E Blackburn
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Rayburn Correctional Institution, Karla Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Nicholas et al
as 2:2022cv04002
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Brian Nicholas, Travis Day, Kevin Luper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Rayburn Correctional Center et al
as 2:2022cv03483
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Rayburn Correctional Center, Travis Day, Kevin Luper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
