Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Senty-Haugen v. Jesson et al
as 0:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Jesson et al
as 0:2022cv03059
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Benson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boots v. Johnson et al
as 0:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
Bill M. Boots
Defendant:
Nathan Johnson, Kevin Carlson, Richard O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greene v. Osborne-Leivian et al
as 0:2019cv00533
Defendant:
Crystal Leal, Laurie Severson, Randy Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Guy I. Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boots v. Johnson et al
as 0:2017cv03923
Plaintiff:
Bill M. Boots
Defendant:
Nathan Johnson, Kevin Carlson, Richard O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Senty-Haugen et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2014cv03405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, Russell John Hatton and Brandon Keith Benson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, the et al
as 0:2012cv01554
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, the, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Jesson et al
as 0:2012cv01410
Plaintiff:
Michael Pittman
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv01137
Plaintiff:
Al Folson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
