Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Davis et al v. Patel et al
as 3:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Davis and Janice Carter Davis
Defendant:
Samunka Patel, Pinal Patel and Manish Kumar Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dodge v. Jay's Family Restaurant et al
as 3:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dodge
Defendant:
Jay's Family Restaurant , Charlotte Davis and David Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Portrait innovations
as 2:2014cv02022
Plaintiff:
Cinnamon Davis
Defendant:
Portrait innovations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Davis v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01091
Plaintiff:
Mary Davis
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. , Amazon.com.DEDC, LLC and Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Damron Trucking, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01256
Plaintiff:
Billie Diane Davis
Defendant:
Damron Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Young et al v. Life Care Centers of America et al
as 1:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Tammy Young , Jan Reid , Debra Christensen and others
Defendant:
Life Care Centers of America , Life Care Center of East Ridge and Life Care Center of College Dale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilson et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al
as 2:2012cv02258
Plaintiff:
Murray Wilson , Chris Collins , Kevin Perry and others
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee and Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lawson et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc (TV2)
as 3:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
James R Lawson , Michael Alberson , William T Allen and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Lovelace
as 1:2011cv01379
Plaintiff:
Maggie R. Davis
Defendant:
Keith Lovelace
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reeves v. Darrell Davis Roofing, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01213
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Reeves
Defendant:
Darrell Davis Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
