Cases 31 - 40 of 62
KELSO v. COMPLETE HOME RENOVATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00430
Defendant:
COMPLETE HOME RENOVATIONS, INC. and JOHN R. WILSON
Plaintiff:
JACKIE KELSO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CONLEY v. AIRBRIDGE LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01863
Defendant:
AIRBRIDGE LLC and STEVEN R. GERRISH
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. CONLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BLAKLEY et al v. CELADON GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
HELEN BLAKLEY, WILLIAM BLAKLEY and KIMBERLY SMITH
Defendant:
CELADON GROUP, INC., CELADON TRUCKING SERVICES, INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Simonis v. Fort Wayne City of
as 1:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
John L. Simonis
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
PEREZ v. INDIAN HILLS PRODUCE, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00221
Defendant:
INDIAN HILLS PRODUCE, INC. and JOHN TOTH
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US Department of Labor v. Five M's, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Five M's, LLC , R-Way Inc. and John Morgavan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHARPLESS V. ECHO OF MOVEMENT, et al.
as 1:2015cv00051
Defendant:
ECHO OF MOVEMENT, INC. and M. CHARLIE MARSH
Plaintiff:
JOHN SHARPLESS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
THROCKMORTON v. HOLLIFIELD et al
as 2:2014cv00383
Defendant:
JOHN HOLLIFIELD
Plaintiff:
ERIC L. THROCKMORTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILKINSON v. CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01435
Defendant:
CELLULAR SALES OF INDIANA, LLC and CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. WILKINSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HALE v. UNION SAVINGS BANK
as 1:2014cv00933
Plaintiff:
JOHN L HALE
Defendant:
UNION SAVINGS BANK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
